Top 10 Anti Aging Science Myths and Failures

OMG! I'm transforming into an Anti Aging Scientist!!!

This is bad. Until recently I can argue against different antiaging techniques, experiments. I can spot innumerable scientific problems with the antiaging science and the aging science.

But now I can give you a lot of experimental references, provin all kind of things, and starting to miss the big picture.

So let's get back to the basics antiaging research problems:

1. We use way too much statistical longevity data, but we fail to make the connections between mortality data and molecular damage. (Corelation does not mean Causation, Death rate is not aging.)

2. We don't have any Top Aging Factors contributing to aging.

3. We start from random molecular reactions and try to demonstrate the damage instead of starting from the damage and work our way back!. We just want to prove that our free radical theory is the cause of all the primary aging processes.

4. Increases from the lifespan of primitive organism cannot be translated to humans. There are extremely big difference in the mortality causes of a Yeast, Drosophila, Mouse and Humans!

5. The massive Aging research is done in reality by isolated laboratories and individuals who try to make a small profit (to be able to continue the experiments), so the results changed(involuntary) to obtain their expected results.

6. Aging research fundings are laughable, what do we expect for the results. (2.000$ prize for teams which will work months or even years from SENS ... )